The Injuries Can Be Life-Changing.
The Injuries Can Be Life-Changing.

Pedestrians have almost no physical protection when struck by a car, truck, rideshare vehicle, or other motor vehicle.
A driver may fail to yield in a crosswalk, turn without seeing someone, run a light, speed through an intersection, or simply not pay enough attention.
When that happens, the consequences can be severe.
Ryan Alexander and his team help injured pedestrians throughout Las Vegas investigate what happened, preserve evidence, identify available insurance, and pursue the compensation available under Nevada law.
A pedestrian does not have:
a seat belt
airbags
a vehicle frame
a helmet in most situations
any meaningful barrier between their body and the vehicle
That means even a collision at relatively modest speed can cause significant injuries.
Pedestrian cases can also become heavily disputed.
The driver may claim:
the pedestrian crossed outside a crosswalk
the pedestrian stepped into traffic suddenly
the pedestrian ignored a signal
visibility was poor
the pedestrian was distracted
the driver had no time to stop
Those claims make the physical evidence, roadway layout, signals, video, witness statements, and timing especially important.
A driver fails to yield to a pedestrian lawfully crossing at a marked or unmarked crosswalk.
A driver looks for other cars while turning but fails to notice a pedestrian entering or already inside the crosswalk.
Signals, right-of-way, timing, visibility, and conflicting accounts can all become important.
Drivers backing out or turning through parking aisles can strike pedestrians at relatively low speeds and still cause serious injuries.
A driver strikes a pedestrian and leaves the scene, creating additional investigative and insurance issues.
Pedestrians near transit stops may be exposed to turning vehicles, buses, rideshare vehicles, and high-volume traffic.
Lighting, visibility, speed, clothing, roadway design, and driver attention can become central issues.
Drivers have heightened reasons to exercise caution near schools, crossings, children, and areas designed for pedestrian activity.
You may still have a claim. Nevada uses comparative negligence.
Under NRS 41.141, an injured plaintiff may still recover when their negligence is not greater than the negligence of the defendant or combined defendants, although the amount recovered can be reduced according to the plaintiff’s percentage of fault. (Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau)
For example, an insurer might argue that the pedestrian crossed outside a designated area while the pedestrian argues that the driver was speeding, distracted, or had ample opportunity to avoid the collision. Both may become part of the liability analysis.
No. Pedestrians have significant protections, particularly in crosswalks, but pedestrians also have duties under Nevada law. The exact location, signals, and circumstances matter.
Nevada law requires drivers to yield, slowing or stopping as necessary, when a pedestrian is lawfully within the applicable portion of a crosswalk under NRS 484B.283.
An unmarked crosswalk can exist at an intersection. The absence of painted lines does not automatically determine who had the right-of-way.
Nevada law generally requires pedestrians crossing outside a marked or qualifying unmarked crosswalk to yield to vehicles. However, drivers still have a duty to exercise due care to avoid collisions.
That does not automatically defeat the claim. Visibility, lighting, speed, driver attention, location, and available video should be evaluated.
There may still be investigative and insurance options. Video and witness evidence should be pursued quickly.
There is no standard value. Injury severity, long-term effects, fault, insurance coverage, lost income, evidence, and other factors all matter.
© 2026 | Attorney Ryan Alexander - All Rights Reserved